Action Review for Outcome (j)
Know contemporary issues |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
There were no specific Curriculum Action items concerning (j) from the
previous review cycle. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The mean for this outcome was virtually unchanged from 2003 to 2004. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
N |
No Actions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
There were no specific Assessment Process Action items concerning (j) from
the previous review cycle. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
There is a need to develop an Online Senior Survey as an instrument to assess
outcome (j) and broaden instruments inventory beyond MET 321 and 310 if
additional instrument can be identified. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
A |
New metric
development |
Seek
new instruments for the Outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No action required during the previous review cycle. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Need to augment Online Senior Survey as an instrument to assess outcome (j),
and to broaden beyond 321 and 310 instruments. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
A |
Instruments
utilized |
Need
to broaden the number of instruments beyond MET 321 and MET 310 instruments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Remove FC module on contemporary issues from Met 321 and find it a new home. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The assessment process is limited by the single instrument that was available
to assess this outcome. Need to find areas in the curriculum to assess this
outcome. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
A |
Instruments
untilzed |
Need
to identify new instruments to assess this outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
The FC modules on contemporary issues remain in MET 321 but should be moved
elsewhere in the curriculum. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The
lack of data to assess (only one data set) clearly indicates that this
outcome assessment process needs to be reviewed and modified. |
The instrument inventory needs to be revaluated. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
A |
Lack of data to
assess outcome |
This
is a continuing action that needs careful attention to the number and quality
of instruments to assess this outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Move FC module on contemporary issues. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The FC modules on contemporary issues remain in MET 321 but should be moved
elsewhere in the curriculum. Since MET 321 is taught in alternate year
sequence this provides for a lack of data, as is the case in this assessment
cycle. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
A |
Location and
use of FC modules |
FC
modules and their utilization needs to determined. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Improve instruction on Outcome (j) is
warranted. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Three instruments were available for assessment. Two different assessors were
utilized and two different curricular instruments were used. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
W |
Evaluate
curricular instruments |
* The
use of the Local Exam and the Senior Survey appear to have brought stability
to the instrument inventory, but this needs continued monitoring. * The metrics from this outcome (3.69
average) seem to indicate adequate student performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Action is continuing to be assessed.
Use of MET 321 during this cycle should improve the robustness of the
assessment. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Triangulation of this outcome was realized.
There was little variation in the data across the three instruments
that were utilized. As noted above an
increase in the number of instruments utilized would helped improve the
diversity of the data collected for this outcome. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No action
required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Improved Instruction on Outcome (j)
Contemporary Issues was warranted. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Two
instruments were used to assess this outcome. |
A broader number of instruments would increase the robustness and depth of
the assessment. |
Two different assessors (student self-assessment and a keyed assessment) were
utilized. |
An average score of 4.24 is indicative that students are performing well on
this Outcome. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
W |
Watch use of
curricular instruments. |
Continue
to monitor utility of the new instruments that have been developed to measure
this Outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Continue to strengthen the Contemporary Issues Module and embedding in MET
321 class in the Spring 2009. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The instrument inventory needs to be expanded so that triangulation
results. Otherwise the assessment
process appears to be performing adequately. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
W |
Instrument
invetory watch |
Continue
to watch the instruments utilized and if need be expand the instrument
inventory to measure this Outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Improved Instruction on Outcome (j) Contemporary Issues was warranted. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
It was found that the student scores from the instruments used during the
assessment cycle were on average reasonably high (average 3.92). |
Overall, the student performance on this outcome appears adequate. |
N |
No
action required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
The instrument inventory needs to be expanded so that triangulation results. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Unlike the previous assessment period triangulation assessment occurred. |
An additional instrument to the assessment "toolbox" would help
make the Assessment Process for this Outcome more robust. |
W |
Consider
Expanding Instrument Inventory for (j) |
The
instrument inventory should be monitored carefully, and if possible the
instrument inventory expanded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
It was found that the student scores from the instruments used during the
assessment cycle were on average reasonably high (average 3.92). |
Overall, the student performance on this outcome appears adequate. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Scores
up, but there was little variation |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No action
required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Unlike the previous assessment period triangulation assessment occurred. |
An additional instrument to the assessment "toolbox" would help
make the Assessment Process for this Outcome more robust. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The
low variation in scores suggests more instruments are needed, but given the
2-year course cycle, another year watching is warranted |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
W |
Consider
expanding instrument inventory |
low
variation possibly due to only 2 instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Scores
up, but there was little variation |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Continued
high scores with low variation |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No action
required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
The
low variation in scores suggests more instruments are needed, but given the
2-year course cycle, another year watching is warranted |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Low
variation with few instruments |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
A |
Add MET 310
Writing Assignment |
The
current global issues writing assignment also has a contemporary issues
component that may make a good additional instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Continued
high scores with low variation |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Students
continue to perform well. No action
Needed. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Low
variation with few instruments |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. No
Action Needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action
Needed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Students
continue to perform well. No action
Needed. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance was 4.25 during 2013. No
action Needed. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. No
Action Needed. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. No
Action Needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance was 4.25 during 2013. No
action Needed. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
There
may be some even-odd year oscillation but both years indicate high
performance. No Action needed. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. No
Action Needed. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. There
is good consistency between the assessments that make up the process for
Outcome j. No Action needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
There
may be some even-odd year oscillation but both years indicate high
performance. No Action needed. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance continued to be good. No
Action needed. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. There
is good consistency between the assessments that make up the process for
Outcome j. No Action needed. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
All
instruments are performing well. No
Action needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|