Action Review for Outcome (e) Identify, formulate, and solve
engineering problems |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No
Curriculum Action needs were stated for Outcome (e ) for 2004. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance appears to be at a satisfactory level. A slight decrease is noted compared to the
previous two years. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
There was no previous Assessment Process Actions needed for 2004. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Assessment instruments appear to be working well with consistent agreement
between instruments. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Curriculum Actions were identified for Outcome (e) for 2005. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Students continue to perform well solving engineering problems. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Assessment Process Action was needed for Outcome (e) for 2005. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Process seems adequate. |
A small number of instruments were used. |
Additional instruments may need to be added because of small number during
odd years. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
W |
Small Number of
Instruments |
* A
small number of instruments are used to assess Outcome (e) in odd years,
additional instruments may need to be added in odd years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Curriculum Actions were identified for Outcome (e) for 2006. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Students continue to perform well. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Assessment Process Action was needed for Outcome (e) for 2006. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Process is adequate with good agreement between instruments. No Changes
needed for 2007. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Curriculum Actions were identified for Outcome (e) for 2007. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Students continue to perform well solving engineering problems. |
The
senior class of 2007 had a very high GPA.
It is noted to watch performance for
next year. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
W |
High GPA of
2007 Class |
*
Watch student performance in Outcome (e) in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Process is adequate with good agreement between instruments. No Changes
needed for 2007. |
No actions were proposed for 2007 |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Assessment process appears adequate. |
In 2005, it was noted that only a small number of instruments were used in
odd years. This has been addressed by
adding questions to the Local Exam. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Curriculum Actions were recommended. |
It was recommended to watch student performance in 2008 because of high GPA
of 2007 graduating seniors. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student performance remains at a consistently high level for Outcome (e). |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
There was no previous Assessment Process Action needed for 2008. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Assessment process for Outcome (e) seems to be working well. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Curriculum Action was suggested. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student performance seems satisfactory. |
N |
No action
required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
No Assessment Process actions were suggested. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
It is noted that the Senior Survey indicates that the students are confident
in their abilities to solve engineering problems; however, Local Exam results
indicate a different picture. This may
indicate students are not doing as well as they think. |
W |
Local Exam vs.
Senior Survey |
*
Local Exam results are much lower than Senior Survey. This difference may need to be watched in
the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student performance seems satisfactory. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Code |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
It is noted that the Senior Survey indicates that the students are confident
in their abilities to solve engineering problems; however, Local Exam results
indicate a different picture. This may
indicate students are not doing as well as they think. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Code |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Curriculum
Review Summary |
Student
performance showed a slight decrease during this period compared to 2010.
However, results are consistent with those for 2009 where the same
instruments were used. Thus, no action needed. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
N |
No action
required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
Senior
survey remains higher than local. Watch continued. FE exam has only 1 assessment during this
period. Watch continued. Consider removing this assessment or looking for
method to increase number of students taking FE exam. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
W |
Local Exam vs
Senior Survey |
Senior
Survey results higher than local exam results. Continue to watch this
discrepancy. |
W |
Limited number
of FE exams |
Watch
the number of FE exams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance showed a slight decrease during this period compared to 2010.
However, results are consistent with those for 2009 where the same
instruments were used. Thus, no action needed. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance showed significant drop compared to 2010 (where the same
instruments were used). Decline is student performance is likely associated
with the addition of new faculty to the program. Add watch on overall outcome
performance to see if this persists. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
W |
Low scores |
Decline
in student performance observed from 2010 to 2012. Continue to watch to see
if performance persists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Senior
survey remains higher than local. Watch continued. FE exam has only 1 assessment during this
period. Watch continued. Consider removing this assessment or looking for
method to increase number of students taking FE exam. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Senior
survey and local exam results are much closer during this period. Watch
continued. FE exam had 9 assessments
during this period. Continue to watch the number of assessments to determine
if removal of instrument is needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
W |
Local Exam vs
Senior Survey |
Senior
Survey results higher than local exam results. Continue to watch this
discrepancy. |
W |
Limited number
of FE exams |
Watch
the number of FE exams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance showed significant drop compared to 2010 (where the same
instruments were used). Decline is student performance is likely associated
with the addition of new faculty to the program. Add watch on overall outcome
performance to see if this persists. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance has increased enough to question the significannce of the 2012
decrease in performance. Watch will
continue. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
W |
Low
Performance Watch |
Determine
if the current rebound in scores is permanent or if there is an odd/even year
oscillation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
Senior
survey and local exam results are much closer during this period. Watch
continued. FE exam had 9 assessments
during this period. Continue to watch the number of assessments to determine
if removal of instrument is needed. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
FE
Exam has been removed from inventory because too few students were taking it. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance has increased enough to question the significannce of the 2012
decrease in performance. Watch will
continue. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance has decreased not unlike two years ago. If this were an effect of the cohort
system it should have persisted from earlier years but opposite phase high
values were observed in 2010 and earlier years. Consequently, this is unlikely the result
of the cohort system. For the time
being it must be considered a probable noise pattern, but the low values
warrant a Watch of student performance. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
W |
Determine
direction of performance |
See
if oscillating student performance is improving or declining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
FE
Exam has been removed from inventory because too few students were taking it. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
The
system no longer uses the FE Exam owing to low participatioon in the
exam. The remaining instruments seem
to be performing adequately. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Curriculum Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance has decreased not unlike two years ago. If this were an effect of the cohort
system it should have persisted from earlier years but opposite phase high
values were observed in 2010 and earlier years. Consequently, this is unlikely the result
of the cohort system. For the time
being it must be considered a probable noise pattern, but the low values
warrant a Watch of student performance. |
Curriculum
Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
Student
performance returned to substantially higher levels (3.77 from 3.29). The
watch is continued. |
Code |
Curriculum Action Title |
Curriculum Action Brief
Description |
|
|
W |
Determine
direction of performance |
See
if oscillating student performance is improving or declining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Assessment Process Action Review Summary |
|
|
|
The
system no longer uses the FE Exam owing to low participatioon in the
exam. The remaining instruments seem
to be performing adequately. |
Assessment
Process Review Summary |
|
|
|
|
No
action is needed. |
Code |
Assessment Process Action Title |
Assessment Process Action
Brief Description |
|
N |
No Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|